What is the Orthodox Lift and why is it dangerous?
The Orthodox Lift is a historic patient handling technique that involves two carers standing on either side of a person and joining hands to form a 'cradle' to lift them. The technique typically involves clasping wrists behind the patient's back and under their thighs, and lifting them together. This method was once used to move patients, but is now considered extremely dangerous and is strictly prohibited in professional care settings for a number of critical reasons.
The clear dangers for patients
For the person being lifted, the Orthodox Lift poses several serious hazards:
- Risk of injury: The lifting motion is jerky and unstable, increasing the risk of dropping the patient or causing a fall.
- Shear forces and skin damage: The hands and arms clasped under the thighs and back can cause significant skin damage due to shear forces, especially on fragile skin.
- Physical discomfort and pain: The lift is uncomfortable and undignified for the patient. For individuals with existing painful conditions, such as arthritis or back problems, the method can cause immense distress.
The inherent risks for carers
The Orthodox Lift also presents a high risk of injury to the care providers performing it. The technique requires lifting and twisting at a distance from the body's centre of gravity, placing immense strain on the lower back and shoulders.
- Increased strain on the back: The poor posture and twisting motion required during the lift directly contribute to back strain and long-term musculoskeletal disorders.
- Shoulder and wrist injuries: The method of clasping wrists and lifting a person's entire body weight at arm's length puts extreme pressure on the carers' shoulders and wrists.
- Uneven weight distribution: The weight of the patient is often unevenly distributed, further exacerbating the risk of injury for the carers.
Legal and professional consequences
The use of the Orthodox Lift is not just unsafe; it is a breach of professional and legal guidelines in many regions. Since its condemnation in 1987, many health and safety authorities have reinforced the ban on such manual techniques. Using this method could lead to professional misconduct charges, disciplinary action, and even legal prosecution for negligence.
Modern and safe alternatives to manual lifting
Professional healthcare practice has moved far beyond outdated and dangerous manual lifting methods. Today, caregivers are trained to use a range of specialised, assistive equipment to ensure the safety and dignity of both the patient and themselves. Here are some of the most common and effective alternatives:
- Hoists: These mechanical lifts are the primary method for moving patients who cannot bear their own weight. They can be mobile or ceiling-mounted, using slings to safely transfer a person between beds, chairs, and other surfaces.
- Sliding sheets and transfer aids: For repositioning a patient in a bed or chair, sliding sheets reduce friction and allow for smooth, effortless movement without straining the carer's back or causing shear forces on the patient's skin.
- Transfer boards and belts: These tools are used to assist with a transfer from one surface to another (e.g., bed to wheelchair) for patients who have some weight-bearing ability but require assistance.
- Gait belts: These belts are placed around a patient's waist to provide a secure handhold for a carer during assisted walking or standing, significantly reducing the risk of falls.
A comparison of lifting techniques
To highlight the difference between dangerous and safe practices, consider this comparison between the condemned Orthodox Lift and modern, approved methods.
Feature | Orthodox Lift | Modern Mechanical Hoist | Modern Transfer Aids (e.g., Slings) |
---|---|---|---|
Equipment Used | Hands, arms, and wrists only | Mechanical hoist, slings | Specialised sheets, belts, boards |
Safety for Patient | Very low; high risk of injury, shear forces, and falls | Very high; controlled, stable, and comfortable | Very high; reduces shear, promotes dignity, controlled |
Safety for Carer | Very low; high risk of back, shoulder, and wrist injury | Very high; removes physical strain from the carer | High; reduces physical strain and improper posture |
Dignity of Patient | Low; can be frightening and undignified | High; comfortable and controlled process | High; promotes patient participation where possible |
Legal/Compliance | Illegal; officially condemned practice | Fully compliant with modern health & safety laws | Fully compliant with modern health & safety laws |
Training and prevention of injury
For any person involved in caregiving, mandatory manual handling training is essential. Proper training covers not only the safe use of equipment but also the risks associated with improper techniques. Resources like those from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) provide detailed guidance on best practices.
Best practice manual handling principles
- Assess the load and environment: Always evaluate the situation before acting. Is the path clear? Is the load manageable?
- Use appropriate equipment: Never rely on manual lifts for a task that requires mechanical assistance. Hoists, sliding sheets, and transfer belts are available for a reason.
- Maintain proper posture: When any lifting is required, even with a gait belt, keep your back straight, bend your knees, and use your legs, not your back.
- Communicate clearly: If another person is helping, coordinate your movements and communicate clearly to ensure a smooth, controlled lift.
Conclusion
The Orthodox Lift is a relic of a past that did not prioritise patient and carer safety. It is now a universally condemned and unsafe technique that should never be used. Modern assistive technologies and proper training have replaced these dangerous practices, ensuring safer, more efficient, and more dignified care for everyone involved. If you are ever in a situation where this method is suggested, it is vital to refuse and insist on using approved, safe equipment and techniques. Prioritising health and safety is not only the legal requirement but also the ethical responsibility of every caregiver.