Skip to content

Does ALH Need to Be Excised? A Comprehensive Guide to Treatment Options

4 min read

According to the National Cancer Institute, atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is a benign breast condition that increases the risk of breast cancer later in life. Given this, many people ask, 'Does ALH need to be excised?' The answer is not always, as the decision is highly personalized and depends on several factors.

Quick Summary

Not all atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) diagnoses require immediate surgical excision. The course of treatment depends on specific factors, such as biopsy results, radiological findings, and a patient's overall risk profile. Options range from active surveillance to medication or surgical removal, determined in consultation with a breast specialist.

Key Points

  • Excision Is Not Automatic: A diagnosis of ALH does not always mean you need surgical excision, as recent guidelines support conservative management in specific low-risk cases.

  • Radiological-Pathological Correlation Is Key: The decision for excision is heavily influenced by whether imaging results match the biopsy pathology. Discordant findings often necessitate excision.

  • Risk Assessment is Individualized: Your personal and family history of breast cancer, as well as genetic factors, are crucial in determining the best course of action.

  • Observation Is a Valid Option: In low-risk, concordant cases, active surveillance with enhanced screening (mammograms, MRI) is a safe and effective management strategy.

  • Risk-Reducing Medication is an Alternative: For patients at high risk who prefer to avoid surgery, chemoprevention drugs can help lower the risk of future breast cancer.

  • Shared Decision-Making is Essential: Patients should have an in-depth conversation with their breast specialist to weigh all the factors and create a personalized plan.

In This Article

What Is Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia (ALH)?

Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is a benign (non-cancerous) breast condition characterized by the abnormal growth of cells within the breast's lobules. While it is not cancer itself, it is considered a marker of increased risk for developing breast cancer in either breast. This diagnosis is often an incidental finding during a core needle biopsy performed for another reason, such as investigating a suspicious area seen on a mammogram or ultrasound.

How ALH Is Diagnosed

Diagnosis of ALH is made by a pathologist who examines breast tissue obtained during a biopsy. The core needle biopsy is a common method, where a small tissue sample is extracted. The finding of ALH on a core biopsy is what most often raises the question of whether a larger, surgical excisional biopsy is necessary to ensure no more significant pathology, such as cancer, was missed.

The Role of Excisional Biopsy for ALH

Historically, surgical excision was the standard recommendation following an ALH diagnosis on core needle biopsy. This was primarily due to the risk of sampling error, where the core biopsy might not have captured a more serious lesion, such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer, that was present nearby. In these cases, the ALH finding was said to be 'upgraded' to a cancer diagnosis after the surgical excision.

Factors Influencing the Excision Decision

Today, the decision to proceed with surgical excision is more nuanced and often involves a discussion between the patient and a breast specialist. Several key factors are considered:

  • Radiological-Pathological Correlation: This is a critical factor. If the imaging findings (from the mammogram or ultrasound) perfectly match the benign ALH diagnosis from the biopsy, the case is considered 'concordant'. If there is a mismatch (a 'discordant' finding), surgical excision is more likely to be recommended to investigate further.
  • Extent and Location of the Lesion: If the biopsy reveals multiple foci of ALH or if the area is extensive, surgical excision might be considered.
  • Type of Lesion: ALH is part of a spectrum of breast lobular neoplasia. A similar but more advanced lesion, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), carries a higher risk and more often warrants excision.
  • Patient Risk Factors: A patient's personal history of breast cancer, family history, and genetic predisposition (e.g., BRCA mutations) can influence the decision. Higher-risk patients may be more likely to opt for excision.
  • Patient Preference: The patient's comfort level with risk and follow-up is a key component of shared decision-making. Some may prefer surgical removal to eliminate uncertainty, while others may opt for a surveillance approach.

Conservative Management: Observation and Surveillance

Recent studies have shown that for carefully selected patients, observation and surveillance may be a safe alternative to immediate surgical excision. This is particularly true for those with an incidental diagnosis of isolated ALH found on a core needle biopsy with strong radiological-pathological concordance.

For patients who follow a surveillance-only approach, a typical monitoring plan may include:

  1. Enhanced Imaging: More frequent screening mammograms, often annually.
  2. Supplemental Screening: Annual breast MRI is often recommended, especially for higher-risk individuals.
  3. Regular Clinical Breast Exams: Physical examinations by a healthcare professional at regular intervals.

Other Management Strategies

Beyond excision or observation, other strategies can help manage the increased breast cancer risk associated with ALH:

  • Chemoprevention: Medications such as tamoxifen or raloxifene can be used to reduce the risk of future breast cancer. These hormone-blocking medicines are typically taken for five years and are a significant consideration for high-risk patients.
  • Lifestyle Modifications: Recommendations for reducing overall breast cancer risk include maintaining a healthy weight, regular exercise, and limiting alcohol consumption.
  • Genetic Counseling: For patients with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer, genetic counseling can assess hereditary cancer syndromes, which may affect the management strategy.

Comparison of Management Approaches for ALH

Feature Excisional Biopsy Active Surveillance (Observation)
Primary Goal Remove the lesion, ensure no cancer is present, and obtain definitive pathology. Closely monitor the lesion and surrounding breast tissue over time for any changes.
Best For Cases with discordant radiology/pathology, multiple or extensive lesions, or high-risk patients. Cases with isolated ALH, concordant findings, and lower-risk patients.
Invasiveness Surgical procedure, either with local or general anesthesia. Non-invasive, relying on regular imaging and clinical exams.
Upgrade Risk Eliminates uncertainty regarding upgrade to cancer at the biopsy site. Retains a small risk of occult cancer not captured by the initial biopsy.
Scarring Potential for scarring at the surgical site. No scarring from the procedure itself.
Benefit Peace of mind from definitive diagnosis. Avoids surgery and its associated risks; personalized approach.

Conclusion

While an ALH diagnosis naturally prompts the question, "Does ALH need to be excised?", the answer is not a simple yes or no. The management of ALH has evolved from a mandatory surgical approach to a more nuanced, personalized strategy. For patients with a diagnosis based on core biopsy, the decision-making process involves careful consideration of radiological and pathological findings, individual risk factors, and patient preference. In cases with concordant findings and low-risk features, close observation may be a suitable path, possibly combined with risk-reducing medication. Every patient should have a thorough discussion with a breast specialist to develop a personalized management plan that is right for them.

For more information on breast hyperplasia and its management, consult the guidelines provided by trusted medical sources like the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).

Frequently Asked Questions

No, atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is a benign, non-cancerous condition. However, it is considered a marker for an increased risk of developing breast cancer in the future in either breast.

An 'upgrade' occurs when a core needle biopsy finds ALH, but a subsequent surgical excision reveals a more significant lesion, such as DCIS or invasive cancer. This happens due to sampling error, where the initial biopsy missed the more serious pathology.

Concordance means the findings from your imaging (mammogram or ultrasound) align perfectly with the pathology results from the biopsy. If the findings do not match, it is considered discordant and may lead to a recommendation for surgical excision.

ALH itself doesn't 'turn into' cancer in the traditional sense, but it signifies an increased risk. It is a proliferative lesion that indicates changes in breast tissue, suggesting a higher likelihood of developing breast cancer over time.

Alternatives to surgical excision include active surveillance with regular enhanced imaging (mammograms, MRI) and considering risk-reducing medications like tamoxifen. These options are discussed based on your personal risk assessment.

Patients who are considered good candidates for observation typically have isolated ALH on core needle biopsy with excellent radiological-pathological concordance, no extensive lesions, and no other significant risk factors for immediate upgrade.

Follow-up frequency is determined by your healthcare provider. It often involves annual mammograms and may include annual breast MRI screenings and clinical breast exams more frequently than for average-risk individuals.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.