Skip to content

Is Diaphragm Plication a Major Surgery? What to Expect from the Procedure

4 min read

The diaphragm is the primary muscle of respiration, responsible for up to 81% of tidal volume during deep sleep. When this crucial muscle fails due to paralysis or weakness, a surgical procedure may be necessary, raising the question: Is diaphragm plication a major surgery?

Quick Summary

Diaphragm plication is medically classified as a major surgical procedure performed under general anesthesia. However, advancements have enabled less invasive techniques like VATS and robotic-assisted surgery, which offer quicker recovery compared to older, open methods.

Key Points

  • Major Classification: Diaphragm plication is medically considered a major surgery due to its location and use of general anesthesia.

  • Minimally Invasive Advancements: Modern techniques like VATS and robotic-assisted surgery have significantly improved recovery time compared to traditional open surgery.

  • Symptom Relief: The primary goal is to flatten a paralyzed diaphragm to relieve severe shortness of breath and other respiratory issues caused by lung compression.

  • Reduced Recovery Time: With minimally invasive procedures, hospital stays are short, and many patients return to normal activities within a couple of weeks, though full recovery takes longer.

  • High Success Rate: For properly selected patients, diaphragm plication is a highly effective treatment, with a high success rate in resolving symptoms and improving quality of life.

In This Article

What Exactly is Diaphragm Plication?

Diaphragm plication is a surgical procedure designed to correct a paralyzed or weakened diaphragm, a condition known as diaphragmatic paralysis or eventration. Normally, the diaphragm contracts and flattens to create space for the lungs to expand during inhalation. When it becomes non-functional, it moves upward into the chest cavity, compressing the lung and causing breathing difficulties.

During plication, a thoracic surgeon effectively tightens and flattens the diaphragm by folding and stitching it into place. This allows the lungs to have more room to expand, significantly improving breathing and quality of life for eligible patients. The procedure is often considered for individuals with symptomatic paralysis after conservative treatments have failed.

Minimally Invasive Techniques vs. Open Surgery

Historically, diaphragm plication involved a large incision in the chest wall, known as a thoracotomy, making it a highly invasive procedure with a prolonged recovery. Today, the landscape of thoracic surgery has been revolutionized by technology, and many procedures are performed using minimally invasive techniques. The primary approaches include:

  • Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS): This technique uses small incisions to insert a camera (thoracoscope) and surgical instruments into the chest cavity. The surgeon views the procedure on a monitor, allowing for precise manipulation of the diaphragm with less trauma to the chest wall. Recovery from VATS is often significantly faster than from an open procedure.
  • Robotic-Assisted Surgery: A surgeon operates through small incisions using a robotic system that enhances visualization, dexterity, and precision. This advanced technique can further minimize recovery time and post-operative pain. The goal remains the same: to flatten and secure the diaphragm to improve lung function.
  • Open Thoracotomy: This traditional approach is still used in complex cases or when other surgical options are not feasible. It involves a larger incision and provides the surgeon with direct access to the diaphragm. While more invasive, it remains a standard and effective method for certain patients.

The Plication Procedure: A Step-by-Step Overview

The exact steps of a diaphragm plication procedure depend on the technique used, but the overall process follows a general sequence:

  1. Preparation: The patient is placed under general anesthesia, ensuring they are completely asleep and comfortable throughout the operation.
  2. Incision: For minimally invasive procedures, the surgeon makes several small incisions between the ribs on the side of the paralyzed diaphragm. For an open procedure, a single, larger incision is made.
  3. Access: The surgeon carefully enters the chest cavity. The lung on the affected side is gently deflated to provide a clear view of the diaphragm.
  4. Plication: Using surgical clamps or robotic instruments, the surgeon grasps the elevated, weakened portion of the diaphragm. They then fold or tuck this area and use sutures to flatten it, effectively creating a taut surface.
  5. Closure: Once the diaphragm is secured in its new position, the surgeon may place a chest tube to drain any excess fluid or air. The small incisions are then closed with sutures.

Recovery and Post-Operative Expectations

Recovery is a critical part of the surgical journey and depends heavily on the technique used. For minimally invasive approaches, recovery is significantly quicker, with many patients returning to their normal routines within a few weeks.

  • Hospital Stay: Patients undergoing minimally invasive plication typically stay in the hospital for one to two nights for monitoring and pain management.
  • Initial Recovery: In the first two weeks, patients may experience some soreness and fatigue. Pain is generally managed with medication and typically does not interfere with light daily activities.
  • Long-Term Recovery: Full recovery of energy levels can take up to six weeks. It's important to gradually return to more strenuous activities under a doctor's guidance. For open surgery, recovery is more extensive.
  • Improved Breathing: Most patients experience a notable improvement in symptoms, such as shortness of breath and difficulty lying flat, soon after the procedure.

Potential Risks and Complications

While diaphragm plication is generally considered a safe and effective procedure, all major surgeries carry some risks. Serious complications are rare, but potential issues can include:

  • Bleeding
  • Infection at the incision sites
  • Pneumonia or pleural effusions
  • Injury to adjacent organs such as the spleen, liver, or stomach
  • Injury to the phrenic nerve, which could affect the diaphragm's function
  • Air or fluid collection in the chest that requires further intervention

A Comparison of Plication Techniques

Feature Minimally Invasive (VATS/Robotic) Open Thoracotomy
Incision Size Several small incisions (typically 1-2 cm) One larger incision (approx. 10-15 cm)
Surgical Trauma Significantly less trauma to chest wall and muscles More extensive trauma, leading to increased pain
Hospital Stay Typically 1-2 nights Often several days to a week
Pain Lower post-operative pain, manageable with medication Higher levels of pain, requiring stronger medication
Recovery Time Faster; return to work in 2 weeks, full energy in 6 weeks Slower; weeks to months for full recovery
Cosmetic Result Less scarring, more cosmetically favorable Noticeable scarring
Suitability Most cases of diaphragmatic paralysis Complex cases, specific patient factors, or reoperations

Conclusion: Navigating Your Surgical Decision

Ultimately, is diaphragm plication a major surgery? Yes, it is classified as such due to its location, complexity, and the requirement for general anesthesia. However, modern surgical techniques, particularly minimally invasive ones, have dramatically improved the patient experience by reducing recovery time and post-operative pain. For those suffering from the debilitating effects of a compromised diaphragm, plication offers a highly effective and safe treatment with a strong track record of success. As with any surgical decision, a thorough discussion with a qualified thoracic surgeon is essential to understand the best approach for your specific condition. You can find more details on minimally invasive diaphragm plication techniques, including robotic procedures, on specialized hospital websites like the University of Utah Health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Recovery time depends on the surgical method. With minimally invasive techniques, many patients can resume light activities within two weeks, though it may take up to six weeks to regain full energy levels.

If left untreated, a paralyzed diaphragm can continue to cause symptoms such as severe shortness of breath, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and an increased risk of respiratory infections. Surgery is often recommended when symptoms are severe and conservative management fails.

For certain patients, especially those with bilateral paralysis from spinal cord injuries, a diaphragm pacemaker may be an alternative to restore function. The best option depends on the cause and extent of the paralysis.

Open plication uses a large chest incision, while minimally invasive techniques like VATS use several small incisions. The minimally invasive approach generally results in faster recovery, less pain, and smaller scars.

Diaphragm plication is performed under general anesthesia, ensuring the patient is asleep and pain-free for the duration of the procedure.

A minimally invasive robotic diaphragm plication typically lasts around one hour, though the total time can vary depending on the specifics of the case and the surgeon.

Common risks include bleeding, infection, and injury to surrounding organs. While complications are rare, they are possible with any surgical procedure.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.