The Common Practice: Leaving Orthopedic Hardware In Place
For many patients, surgical rods, screws, and plates—collectively known as orthopedic hardware—can remain safely in the body for a lifetime. The primary purpose of this hardware is to stabilize a fracture while the bone heals. In many cases, once the bone has fully recovered and integrated around the implant, the hardware no longer serves a functional purpose, but can still be left in place without issue. This is especially common with intramedullary rods used to fix fractures in long bones like the femur, where removal involves significant risks.
For most individuals, the decision to leave the hardware is based on a favorable risk-benefit analysis. A second surgery to remove the implant carries its own risks, including infection, damage to nerves, blood loss, and a longer recovery period. If the hardware is not causing any symptoms, the risks associated with removal often outweigh any potential benefit.
Risks and Potential Complications
While it is common for hardware to remain in the body without problems, there are several reasons why complications might arise, necessitating a future surgery. The following issues can emerge at any point, from months to many years after the initial procedure.
Pain and Prominent Hardware
One of the most frequent reasons for removing orthopedic hardware is pain or discomfort. The implant may become prominent, especially in areas with thin soft tissue coverage, such as the ankle, foot, wrist, and collarbone. This can cause irritation when a person wears shoes, puts pressure on the area, or engages in certain activities. Tenderness in the area where the hardware is located is a common symptom.
Infection
While rare, an infection can develop around a surgical implant, even years after the initial surgery. This is because bacteria can adhere to the surface of the metal, making it difficult for the body's immune system to fight them off. Symptoms of infection can include increased pain, swelling, warmth, redness, and wound drainage. A low-grade infection may also cause implant loosening or chronic pain.
Hardware Loosening or Failure
Over time, orthopedic hardware can loosen, bend, or break. Implants have a finite lifespan, and if the fracture doesn't heal correctly, the hardware may be subject to loads that cause it to fail. This can lead to increased pain, implant migration, or the need for revision surgery to replace the broken device. Signs of loosening may be visible on an X-ray as a 'halo' around screws.
Metal Hypersensitivity or Allergic Reaction
Although uncommon, some individuals may have a sensitivity or allergic reaction to the metals in their implants, such as nickel, cobalt, or chromium. This can manifest as persistent pain, swelling, a rash, or eczema around the implant site. These reactions can contribute to implant loosening and failure. Patients with known metal allergies should inform their surgeon before surgery, as special titanium-based materials are often used.
Impact on Adjacent Joints
For certain implants, such as those used in spinal fusion surgery, the presence of the rod can alter the natural movement of the spine. This can place additional stress on the vertebrae above and below the fused segment, leading to accelerated wear and tear and a condition known as adjacent segment disease. This can result in new or worsening back pain over time.
The Decision-Making Process for Removal
Deciding whether to remove a surgical rod is a complex process. It involves a careful evaluation by both the patient and the orthopedic surgeon, weighing the potential risks and benefits. There is no standard guideline for routine removal in adults, with decisions made on a case-by-case basis.
Indications for Removal
- Symptomatic Pain: If the hardware is causing persistent pain, irritation, or functional limitations.
- Infection: If an infection has occurred, removal is often necessary to fully eradicate the bacteria.
- Hardware Failure: If the implant has loosened or broken.
- Incomplete Healing: If the bone did not heal properly (nonunion) and further intervention with different hardware or a bone graft is needed.
- Patient Preference: Some patients, due to psychological discomfort or the desire to resume high-impact activities, may opt for removal.
Weighing the Risks and Benefits
Aspect | Leaving the Hardware In Place | Removing the Hardware |
---|---|---|
Benefits | Avoids risks and costs of a second surgery. Allows for continued support in some cases. No interruption to daily life if asymptomatic. | Can eliminate pain and discomfort caused by prominent or failing hardware. Resolves infections associated with implants. May improve function or reduce psychological discomfort. |
Risks | Potential for long-term complications like pain, infection, or failure. May cause metal allergies. Can interfere with future imaging or treatments. | Risks associated with any surgery, including nerve damage, infection, bleeding, and blood clots. Potential for re-fracture or incomplete pain relief. |
Outcome | Often uneventful, allowing for a normal, active life. Requires monitoring for complications. | Symptoms may resolve, but there is no guarantee. Recovery time is needed, and the implant site will heal over time. |
The Recovery After Hardware Removal
Recovery from hardware removal surgery is generally less intensive than the initial procedure. However, the exact recovery time and restrictions depend on the implant's location and the complexity of the removal. Your surgeon will provide specific post-operative instructions, which may include limited weight-bearing for a period to allow the bone to fully strengthen again. While scar tissue from the original surgery can increase the risk of minor nerve damage during removal, most patients recover without incident.
Conclusion
In conclusion, whether a surgical rod is removed or left in the body is a significant medical decision. For most patients, modern surgical hardware is safe to be left in place permanently, especially when no symptoms are present. The primary triggers for removal are complications such as persistent pain, infection, or mechanical failure of the implant. Each case is unique, and a thorough evaluation of the patient's symptoms, overall health, and the specific risks of a revision surgery is critical. For individuals experiencing issues with their implants, consulting with an orthopedic specialist is the best course of action to determine the most appropriate treatment plan.
For more information on the topic, a detailed article published by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) provides excellent resources on internal fixation for fractures and potential complications.