Skip to content

What are the 5 control measures for reducing the risk of injury?

4 min read

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), implementing effective control measures is vital for protecting people from hazards. This principle is formalized in the Hierarchy of Controls, which outlines what are the 5 control measures for reducing the risk of injury? in order of effectiveness.

Quick Summary

The five control measures for reducing injury risk are elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment (PPE), following a strict hierarchy of effectiveness.

Key Points

  • Elimination is Key: The most effective control measure is to physically remove the hazard entirely from the environment, ensuring zero risk from that source.

  • Substitution Provides Safer Alternatives: If a hazard cannot be eliminated, replace it with a less hazardous material, process, or piece of equipment to reduce overall risk.

  • Engineering Controls Isolate Hazards: Use physical barriers, modifications, or systems to isolate individuals from the hazard, making safety independent of human compliance.

  • Administrative Measures Focus on Behavior: These controls involve changing work procedures, training employees, and providing warnings, but are less reliable as they depend on people following the rules.

  • PPE is the Last Resort: Personal Protective Equipment is the least effective measure, serving as the final barrier between a person and a hazard when other controls are not sufficient.

  • Follow the Hierarchy: Always start with elimination and work down the hierarchy, as combining measures from different levels is often necessary for comprehensive safety.

In This Article

Understanding the Hierarchy of Controls

Controlling hazards is a critical aspect of ensuring safety, whether in a workplace, a home, or a public space. The Hierarchy of Controls is an internationally recognized system that ranks risk reduction strategies from most effective to least effective. The core principle is to manage hazards at their source before relying on measures that depend on human behavior or provide only a last line of defense.

1. Elimination: The Most Effective Measure

Elimination is the most robust control measure because it involves physically removing the hazard entirely. By removing the source of the danger, you completely eliminate the risk of injury associated with it. This method is most effective when it can be considered during the design or planning stage of a project or process. Examples of elimination include:

  • Discontinuing the use of a toxic chemical.
  • Redesigning a process to remove the need for handling a heavy object.
  • Taking a piece of damaged machinery out of service permanently.

By taking this approach, all potential exposure is removed, and the subsequent need for other control measures is rendered obsolete.

2. Substitution: Replacing the Hazard

When it is not possible to eliminate a hazard completely, the next most effective option is to replace it with a safer alternative. This control measure reduces the level of risk without entirely removing the process or activity. This involves careful consideration to ensure the substitute does not introduce new or unexpected hazards.

  • Material Substitution: Replacing a solvent-based paint with a water-based one to reduce exposure to harmful chemicals.
  • Process Substitution: Using automated tools to lift heavy materials instead of manual lifting to prevent musculoskeletal injuries.
  • Equipment Substitution: Using a quieter machine to reduce noise levels in a workshop.

3. Engineering Controls: Isolating People from the Hazard

Engineering controls are physical changes to the workplace or environment that isolate people from the hazard. This is a highly effective method because it does not rely on employees remembering to follow a procedure or wear protective gear correctly. It provides a physical barrier or a modified environment to mitigate risk at the source. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) emphasizes that these controls should be implemented when elimination or substitution is not feasible.

  • Ventilation Systems: Installing exhaust fans or fume hoods to remove airborne contaminants.
  • Machine Guarding: Placing physical guards on machinery to prevent contact with moving parts.
  • Ergonomic Design: Modifying workstations to reduce physical strain and prevent repetitive strain injuries.
  • Isolation: Constructing a sound-proof enclosure around noisy equipment to protect workers from hearing damage.

4. Administrative Controls: Changing the Way People Work

Administrative controls involve changes to work practices, policies, or procedures to reduce exposure to hazards. These measures are less effective than engineering controls because they depend on human behavior and compliance to be successful. They are often used in conjunction with engineering controls or when other methods are not practical.

  • Training and Procedures: Conducting regular training sessions on safety protocols, such as proper lifting techniques.
  • Job Rotation: Rotating employees through different tasks to limit the duration or frequency of exposure to a particular hazard.
  • Warning Systems: Using signs, alarms, or flashing lights to alert people of a hazard.
  • Access Control: Restricting access to hazardous areas to authorized personnel only.
  • Adjusting Work Schedules: Scheduling physically demanding tasks during cooler parts of the day to prevent heat-related illness.

5. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): The Last Line of Defense

PPE is the least effective control measure because it does not eliminate or control the hazard itself; it only protects the individual user from its effects. This places the responsibility of safety largely on the worker. PPE should be used only as a last resort, after all other higher-level controls have been considered and implemented where possible. Examples of PPE include:

  • Gloves to protect hands from chemicals or sharp objects.
  • Safety glasses or goggles to protect eyes from flying debris or chemical splashes.
  • Hard hats to protect heads from falling objects.
  • Earplugs or earmuffs to protect hearing from excessive noise.
  • High-visibility vests for workers in traffic zones.

Comparison of Injury Risk Control Measures

Control Measure Effectiveness Cost (Typical) Effort to Implement Dependence on Human Behavior
Elimination Highest Can be high High Lowest
Substitution High Variable High Low
Engineering Controls Medium to High High High Low
Administrative Controls Medium Low Low High
PPE Lowest Low Low Highest

A Systematic Approach to Injury Reduction

Implementing the Hierarchy of Controls effectively requires a systematic approach, starting with a thorough risk assessment. The process should follow a logical sequence:

  1. Identify Hazards: Start by identifying all potential sources of injury in a given environment. This could involve walkthroughs, reviewing incident reports, or consulting with employees.
  2. Assess Risks: For each identified hazard, evaluate the severity of potential injury and the likelihood of it occurring. This helps prioritize which risks to address first.
  3. Apply the Hierarchy: Begin at the top of the hierarchy (Elimination) and work your way down. Always try to implement the highest level of control possible before moving to the next.
  4. Review and Monitor: Continuously monitor the effectiveness of the implemented controls. Hazards and processes can change over time, requiring adjustments to the control measures. An authoritative source like the CDC provides detailed information on these practices Learn more about the hierarchy of controls here.

Conclusion

Understanding what are the 5 control measures for reducing the risk of injury? is essential for creating a safer environment. By applying the Hierarchy of Controls, organizations and individuals can prioritize the most effective strategies, focusing on eliminating or minimizing hazards at the source rather than relying on less dependable methods like PPE. A proactive and systematic approach to hazard control not only prevents injuries but also fosters a stronger culture of safety and well-being.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference is their reliance on human behavior. Engineering controls are physical solutions built into the environment that don't depend on a person's actions, while administrative controls are procedures and policies that rely on human compliance to be effective.

No, you should never rely solely on PPE if other control measures are possible. PPE is the least effective control because it doesn't remove the hazard and depends entirely on the user wearing it correctly and consistently. It should be used as a last resort in combination with other controls.

The same principles apply at home. Elimination could be removing a trip hazard. Substitution might involve using non-toxic cleaners. An engineering control could be installing a guardrail on stairs. Administrative controls include creating and enforcing household rules. PPE could be wearing gloves while handling chemicals.

An example of a substitution control measure is using a battery-powered piece of equipment instead of a gasoline-powered one. This substitutes a hazardous, fuel-based power source with a safer, electric one.

Elimination is the most effective because it completely removes the hazard, thereby completely removing the risk of injury. With no hazard present, no other control measures are needed to mitigate risk from that specific source.

Risk assessment is the foundational first step. It involves identifying all potential hazards and evaluating their risks before you can decide which control measures to implement. You can't control a hazard effectively until you know what it is.

You should always start with the most effective control measure at the top of the hierarchy (elimination). If that's not feasible, move down to substitution, then engineering controls, and so on. It's best practice to use a combination of controls when possible, starting with the highest level you can reasonably implement.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.