Skip to content

What is the definition of adherence to treatment?

3 min read

Medication non-adherence is a significant public health concern, with some studies reporting that half of patients with chronic illnesses do not follow their prescribed medication regimens. Understanding what is the definition of adherence to treatment is a critical first step toward improving health outcomes and empowering patients in their own care.

Quick Summary

The extent to which a person's behavior aligns with mutually agreed-upon recommendations from a healthcare provider regarding medication, diet, and lifestyle changes.

Key Points

  • Collaborative Process: Adherence to treatment is a voluntary and collaborative process between a patient and a healthcare provider, moving away from the paternalistic idea of 'compliance'.

  • Multifactorial Nature: A patient's adherence is influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including personal beliefs, cost, regimen complexity, side effects, and the provider-patient relationship.

  • High Non-Adherence Rates: Despite the proven benefits of treatment, non-adherence rates for chronic conditions often hover around 50%, highlighting a significant challenge in patient care.

  • Severe Consequences: Failing to adhere to a treatment plan can lead to worsening health outcomes, increased morbidity and mortality, more hospitalizations, and higher healthcare costs.

  • Diverse Measurement Methods: Adherence can be measured using both indirect methods like self-reporting and pharmacy records, and direct methods such as blood tests or observed therapy.

  • Effective Interventions: The most successful interventions often use a combination of educational, behavioral, and technological strategies tailored to the individual patient's needs.

In This Article

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines adherence as “the extent to which a person’s behaviour—taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes—corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider”. This definition highlights a collaborative approach between the patient and provider, emphasizing that the treatment plan is mutually acceptable. The concept of adherence has evolved from the older, more paternalistic term 'compliance' to reflect a shift towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making.

Adherence vs. Compliance: Understanding the Difference

While the terms 'adherence' and 'compliance' were once used interchangeably, modern healthcare distinguishes between them to better reflect the patient's role in their care. This distinction is crucial for fostering a supportive patient-provider relationship built on trust and shared goals.

Feature Adherence Compliance
Patient's Role Active and collaborative; the patient voluntarily agrees to the treatment plan. Passive; the patient is expected to obediently follow instructions without question.
Decision-Making Shared decision-making between the patient and the healthcare provider. The provider is the authority figure who issues instructions.
Psychological Aspect Patient takes responsibility for their well-being, empowered by the treatment plan. Implies obedience to authority, with no proactive or independent choice by the patient.
Non-following Behavior Patient is considered 'non-adherent' and the reasons are explored collaboratively. Patient may be labeled as 'non-compliant,' implying disobedience or failure.

Key Factors Influencing Adherence

Adherence is a complex and multifactorial issue, influenced by a wide range of factors organized into five dimensions according to the WHO framework. Addressing these specific barriers is key to developing effective interventions. These factors include patient-related issues like forgetfulness, beliefs about medication, and health literacy; therapy-related factors such as complex regimens and side effects; socioeconomic factors like treatment cost and social support; and healthcare system-related issues including communication with providers and access to care.

Methods for Measuring Treatment Adherence

Assessing adherence is crucial for monitoring treatment effectiveness, but there is no single "gold standard" method. Healthcare providers often use a combination of direct and indirect methods.

Indirect methods

Indirect methods are less intrusive and include self-reporting through diaries or questionnaires, pill counts, reviewing pharmacy refill records, and using electronic monitoring devices. While useful, these methods can be subject to inaccuracies due to recall bias, patients discarding pills, or devices not confirming ingestion.

Direct methods

Direct methods provide more objective data and include direct observation of the patient taking medication and measuring drug levels in bodily fluids (biochemical markers). These methods are generally more accurate but can be costly and less practical for long-term monitoring.

The Consequences of Poor Adherence

Poor adherence has severe consequences for both individual patients and the healthcare system, leading to treatment failure and significant economic burden. It can result in worsening health outcomes, increased morbidity and mortality, a higher risk of hospitalizations and emergency room visits, and a reduced quality of life. The financial impact is substantial, with estimates of the annual economic cost of non-adherence in the U.S. reaching hundreds of billions of dollars.

Strategies to Improve Adherence

Effective interventions for improving adherence often employ a combination of strategies tailored to the individual patient's needs. These strategies include providing clear patient education about their condition and treatment, fostering open communication with healthcare providers, simplifying complex medication regimens, utilizing medication reminder tools, addressing the cost of medication, and involving pharmacists and other members of the care team. The American Medical Association emphasizes that addressing potential non-adherence is a critical step in providing effective care.

Conclusion

Defining adherence to treatment involves a collaborative relationship where patients actively participate in and agree to a plan that may include medication, diet, or lifestyle changes. The shift from 'compliance' to 'adherence' reflects a modern, patient-centered approach that empowers individuals and builds trust with healthcare providers. Recognizing the various patient, therapy, socioeconomic, and healthcare system factors that influence adherence is crucial for addressing the issue effectively. Poor adherence carries significant health and financial consequences, emphasizing the importance of tailored, multifaceted interventions to support patients. By promoting better communication, patient education, and support tools, the healthcare system can improve adherence, leading to better clinical outcomes and a higher quality of life.

Frequently Asked Questions

Adherence is a collaborative process where a patient agrees to a treatment plan with their provider, taking an active role. Compliance implies a passive role where the patient is expected to obediently follow instructions given by an authority figure.

Adherence is vital for treatment efficacy and improving health outcomes. It prevents disease progression, reduces complications, lowers the risk of hospitalization, and can lead to a better quality of life.

Intentional non-adherence occurs when patients consciously decide not to follow a treatment plan due to concerns about side effects, fear of dependency, beliefs that the medication is unnecessary, or dissatisfaction with treatment results.

Unintentional non-adherence is often caused by practical barriers such as forgetfulness, complex medication schedules, language difficulties, low health literacy, or financial constraints preventing access to medication.

Poor adherence places a heavy financial burden on both patients and the healthcare system through increased hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and the costs of managing preventable complications. Estimates suggest non-adherence costs the U.S. hundreds of billions annually.

Common methods include indirect measures like patient self-reports, electronic monitoring devices, and pharmacy refill data. Direct methods, though more accurate, include directly observing patients or measuring drug levels in their blood.

Patients can use reminder tools like pillboxes and smartphone apps, simplify their medication schedule by working with their doctor, and engage in open communication with their healthcare team to discuss concerns or difficulties.

Providers can improve adherence by fostering better communication, educating patients about their condition and treatment, simplifying regimens, and identifying underlying barriers like cost or side effects.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.