Skip to content

What is the Moff procedure? A Guide to Mitrofanoff and Mohs Surgeries

4 min read

Searches for the 'Moff procedure' are often the result of a typo, typically referring to one of two distinct surgical techniques: the Mitrofanoff procedure or Mohs surgery.

This guide will clearly define each to help you understand the correct medical term and its specific purpose.

Quick Summary

The 'Moff procedure' is a common misspelling that refers to either the Mitrofanoff procedure, a urological surgery for bladder drainage, or Mohs surgery, a precise dermatological procedure for removing skin cancer.

Key Points

  • Spelling Confusion: The term 'Moff procedure' is not a recognized medical term and is a common misspelling of either the Mitrofanoff or Mohs procedures.

  • Mitrofanoff is Urological: This procedure is a major reconstructive surgery that creates a continent channel, often using the appendix, for individuals to catheterize their bladder through a stoma in the abdomen.

  • Mohs is Dermatological: Mohs micrographic surgery is a precise, layered excision technique for removing skin cancers like basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

  • Different Goals: The Mitrofanoff procedure is for managing bladder dysfunction and incontinence, while Mohs surgery is for treating skin cancer effectively with minimal tissue loss.

  • Different Scope: The Mitrofanoff requires major surgery and a significant recovery period, whereas Mohs is typically an outpatient procedure performed under local anesthesia.

In This Article

Demystifying "Moff": The Typographical Confusion

The similarity in sound and spelling between Mitrofanoff and Mohs often leads to confusion, resulting in the misspelled search term "Moff." While one procedure involves reconstructive urology and the other is a specialized skin cancer removal technique, both are significant medical interventions. This article separates the two, detailing their purposes, procedures, and recoveries.

The Mitrofanoff Procedure: Urological Reconstructive Surgery

Developed by Professor Paul Mitrofanoff in 1976, this surgery, also known as an appendicovesicostomy, addresses bladder dysfunction by creating a new channel for urination. It is primarily performed on individuals who cannot empty their bladders through the urethra due to conditions like spina bifida, neurogenic bladder, or bladder exstrophy. The procedure offers increased independence and continence.

What it treats

The Mitrofanoff procedure is a treatment option for children and adults who struggle with self-catheterization through the urethra or experience urinary incontinence. It provides a more convenient and dignified alternative to traditional methods of bladder drainage. Candidates often have conditions that affect bladder control or function.

How it works

During the procedure, surgeons use the patient's appendix to create a narrow channel (conduit) connecting the bladder to a small opening, or stoma, on the abdomen, often discreetly placed in the navel. If the appendix is unavailable, a section of the small intestine can be used. A valve is created where the channel meets the bladder, which closes when the bladder is full to prevent leakage. The patient then inserts a catheter into the stoma at regular intervals to drain urine.

Risks and recovery

The Mitrofanoff is a major surgery requiring a hospital stay of several days to a week. Two temporary catheters will remain in place for a few weeks to allow the new channel to heal. Risks include potential channel narrowing (stenosis), which may require minor revision surgery, as well as mucus buildup from the repurposed tissue, which requires regular irrigation. Other risks include bladder stones, urinary tract infections, and potential electrolyte imbalances. Recovery typically takes six weeks before the patient can begin regular catheterization.

The Mohs Procedure: Precision Skin Cancer Surgery

Named after Dr. Frederic E. Mohs, this specialized technique is used to remove common types of skin cancer, such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). What sets Mohs surgery apart is its methodical, layer-by-layer approach, which allows for the complete removal of cancerous tissue while preserving as much healthy skin as possible.

What it treats

Mohs surgery is highly effective for skin cancers located in cosmetically sensitive or high-risk areas, including the face, ears, neck, and hands. It is also recommended for cancers that are large, have poorly defined borders, are recurrent, or are in areas with a high risk of re-occurrence.

How it works

Performed with local anesthesia, the process involves removing a thin layer of the visible tumor, followed by a thin layer of the surrounding margin. While the patient waits, the surgeon and a technician immediately examine the tissue under a microscope. If any cancer cells are detected at the margin, the surgeon maps their exact location and removes only another thin layer of tissue from that specific spot. This process is repeated until all margins are clear of cancer, ensuring maximum healthy tissue preservation.

Risks and recovery

The primary advantage of Mohs is its high cure rate, up to 99%, for new skin cancers. Recovery time is relatively short, with most patients returning to regular activities within a couple of weeks, though a full cosmetic result may take longer. Risks are minimal but can include bleeding, infection, and scarring. The final surgical site is either closed with stitches, allowed to heal naturally, or, in more extensive cases, repaired with a flap or skin graft.

Comparing Mitrofanoff and Mohs Procedures

Aspect Mitrofanoff Procedure Mohs Procedure
Medical Field Urology (Genitourinary System) Dermatology (Skin)
Primary Purpose Continent urinary diversion for bladder drainage Precise removal of skin cancer
Method Creates a catheterizable channel using the appendix or intestine Layer-by-layer surgical excision with immediate microscopic analysis
Surgical Scope Major reconstructive surgery Outpatient, typically under local anesthesia
Primary Candidate Individuals with bladder dysfunction (e.g., spina bifida, neurogenic bladder) Patients with high-risk or recurrent skin cancers
Healing Time Weeks to a few months 2 to 4 weeks for initial wound healing

Conclusion

While the term "Moff procedure" is incorrect, it often represents a patient's search for information on either the Mitrofanoff or Mohs procedures. The former is a complex urological surgery for bladder drainage, and the latter is a highly precise dermatological technique for skin cancer removal. Understanding the stark difference between these two medical interventions is crucial for seeking the correct information and discussing treatment options with a healthcare provider. For further reading on the Mitrofanoff procedure, a comprehensive overview is available from the Cleveland Clinic.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the term "Moff procedure" is a common misspelling. Most people searching for this are looking for information on either the Mitrofanoff procedure, a urological surgery, or the Mohs procedure, a dermatological surgery.

The Mitrofanoff procedure is a reconstructive urological surgery designed to help people with bladder dysfunction, such as those with spina bifida or a neurogenic bladder, to drain urine more easily. It creates a new channel for catheterization.

Mohs surgery is used to treat common skin cancers, most notably basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). It is especially useful for cancers in cosmetically sensitive areas or those with a high risk of recurrence.

Surgeons typically use the appendix to create a channel from the bladder to an opening (stoma) on the abdomen. This allows the patient to perform self-catheterization to empty their bladder intermittently.

The surgeon removes the tumor layer by layer, examining each layer microscopically as the patient waits. This process continues until all layers are clear of cancer cells, ensuring complete removal while preserving healthy tissue.

Yes, while often performed on children with congenital bladder issues, the Mitrofanoff procedure is also a viable option for adults who have difficulty with urethral catheterization.

Benefits include increased continence, greater independence for individuals with bladder dysfunction, and a more discreet, easier method of bladder drainage compared to traditional urethral catheterization or an external urine collection bag.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.