Skip to content

Can lymphedema growths be removed? A guide to surgical options

4 min read

Lymphedema affects millions globally, and for some, the condition can progress to cause significant tissue changes and growths. When conservative measures fall short, many people ask: Can lymphedema growths be removed? This guide provides an authoritative overview of the surgical possibilities and what they entail.

Quick Summary

Surgical procedures, such as liposuction and debulking, can be used to remove lymphedema growths, particularly in advanced cases where excess fat and fibrous tissue have accumulated and not responded to conservative treatments. These excisional techniques reduce limb volume but do not cure the underlying lymphatic dysfunction.

Key Points

  • Surgical Removal is Possible: Advanced lymphedema growths, particularly fibrotic fatty tissue, can be removed through excisional surgeries like liposuction or debulking.

  • Not a Cure: Surgery addresses the symptoms (the growths) but does not fix the underlying damaged lymphatic system, meaning ongoing management is necessary.

  • Conservative Treatment First: Excising growths is typically a last resort, used after conservative therapies like compression have failed to produce results.

  • Lifelong Commitment to Compression: After surgery, patients must wear compression garments indefinitely to maintain the volume reduction and prevent fluid re-accumulation.

  • Consult a Specialist: The decision to pursue surgical removal requires careful consideration with a qualified lymphedema specialist, as procedures carry risks and extensive recovery times.

  • Excisional vs. Physiological Surgery: Excisional procedures (liposuction, debulking) remove tissue, while physiological microsurgery (LVA) attempts to reroute lymph flow. They serve different purposes and may be combined.

In This Article

Understanding Lymphedema and the Development of Growths

Lymphedema is a chronic condition characterized by the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the body's tissues, leading to swelling. This occurs when the lymphatic system, a vital part of the immune system, is damaged or impaired. While conservative treatments like compression therapy and manual lymphatic drainage are standard, long-term fluid buildup can cause permanent changes to the tissue. This often involves a process known as fibrosis, where connective tissue and fat deposits accumulate, leading to firm, sometimes nodular, growths that are resistant to non-surgical methods. These growths are the focus of surgical intervention when other therapies fail.

Primary vs. Secondary Lymphedema

It's important to distinguish between the two main types of lymphedema:

  • Primary Lymphedema: Caused by genetic or developmental abnormalities of the lymphatic system. It can be present at birth or develop later in life.
  • Secondary Lymphedema: The more common type, resulting from damage to the lymphatic system, often caused by surgery (especially lymph node removal for cancer treatment), radiation therapy, infection, or trauma.

Surgical Options for Removing Lymphedema Growths

For advanced lymphedema where growths and excess fibrotic tissue have developed, several surgical options exist. These are typically considered only after extensive conservative treatment has proven ineffective.

Liposuction

Liposuction is a well-established excisional procedure for lymphedema that targets the fibrous, fatty tissue that has accumulated over time. The procedure involves:

  1. Small incisions are made in the affected area.
  2. A cannula (a thin, hollow tube) is inserted to break up and suction out the excess tissue.
  3. This technique is effective for reducing limb volume but requires the patient to wear compression garments indefinitely afterward to maintain the results.

Debulking Surgery (Charles Procedure)

For the most severe and advanced cases, a more radical debulking procedure, sometimes known as the Charles procedure, may be used. This involves:

  • Removing all the damaged skin and fat down to the muscle layer.
  • Resurfacing the area with skin grafts taken from another part of the body.
  • This procedure carries higher risks and a more extensive recovery period, making it a last-resort option.

Conservative vs. Surgical Treatment for Lymphedema

Deciding between conservative and surgical management depends on the lymphedema stage and individual patient factors. Here is a comparison:

Feature Conservative Management (CDT) Surgical Management (Excisional)
Goal Manage swelling, prevent progression Remove excess tissue, reduce limb volume
Techniques Compression garments, manual lymphatic drainage, exercise Liposuction, debulking surgery
Lymphedema Stage Best for early to moderate stages Reserved for advanced stages
Invasiveness Non-invasive Invasive
Recovery Ongoing, integrated into daily life Weeks to months post-surgery
Effect on Underlying Condition Manages symptoms, does not cure Addresses symptoms, does not cure

Potential Risks and Recovery

Any surgical procedure comes with risks. For excisional lymphedema surgery, these can include:

  • Infection and Delayed Healing: The compromised lymphatic system can make healing more difficult.
  • Skin Necrosis: Death of the grafted skin tissue, particularly with debulking procedures.
  • Recurrence: There is a risk that the lymphedema will return or worsen.
  • Scarring: All surgical procedures will result in some level of scarring.

Recovery from debulking surgery can be extensive, often requiring a hospital stay of weeks to months. For liposuction, recovery is generally shorter but requires meticulous postoperative care, including consistent compression therapy.

The Importance of Post-Surgical Care

Surgery is not a cure for lymphedema, and ongoing management is critical for long-term success. Following an excisional procedure, a patient must commit to a lifelong regimen of compression therapy to prevent fluid from re-accumulating. Without this consistent management, the lymphedema will likely recur. Working closely with a lymphedema therapist is essential to ensure proper fitting of garments and adherence to the management plan.

Beyond Surgery: Considering Complementary Therapies

While surgery can remove existing growths, other therapies can help manage the underlying condition and improve outcomes. These may include:

  • Physiological Procedures: Microsurgical techniques like lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) aim to reconnect lymphatic channels to small veins, improving drainage. These are typically more effective in earlier stages and are sometimes used alongside excisional procedures.
  • Lifestyle Management: Maintaining a healthy weight and engaging in regular, gentle exercise are crucial components of long-term lymphedema management, both before and after surgery.

For more detailed information on treating lymphedema, visit Johns Hopkins Medicine.

Conclusion: A Path to Improved Quality of Life

The question of whether lymphedema growths can be removed is complex, with the answer depending on the stage and severity of the condition. While excisional surgery can be highly effective in advanced cases to reduce limb volume and improve function, it is not a cure and requires a lifelong commitment to management. By understanding the surgical options, their risks, and the necessity of post-operative care, individuals can make informed decisions in consultation with their healthcare team. The ultimate goal is to enhance the patient's quality of life and manage the chronic symptoms of lymphedema effectively.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, lymphedema growths are not cancerous. They are accumulations of fat and fibrous tissue that develop due to long-term, unmanaged swelling. While in very rare cases chronic lymphedema can increase the risk of certain cancers, the growths themselves are non-malignant.

Surgical removal of lymphedema growths is not a cure. The procedure can effectively reduce the size and volume of an affected limb by removing excess tissue, but it does not repair the underlying lymphatic system damage. Ongoing management is essential to prevent recurrence.

Liposuction uses suction to remove excess fibrous and fatty tissue through small incisions, while debulking (like the Charles procedure) is a more radical surgery that removes damaged skin and fat down to the muscle. Liposuction is less invasive, but both are used for advanced cases.

Suitable candidates are typically individuals with late-stage lymphedema that has not responded to at least six months of intensive conservative therapy. They must also be committed to rigorous post-operative care, including consistent compression therapy.

Recovery time varies by procedure. For liposuction, it can be weeks to months. For more extensive debulking surgeries, a hospital stay of weeks or months may be necessary. Consistent compression and therapy are crucial throughout the recovery process.

If you do not wear compression garments consistently after surgery, the fluid and fibrous tissue will re-accumulate, and the lymphedema growths are highly likely to return. Compression is the single most important factor for maintaining the surgical outcome.

For early-stage lymphedema, conservative treatments are the standard of care and are often highly effective. Surgical removal of growths is typically not considered until the condition has progressed and developed significant, unresponsive tissue changes.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.