Skip to content

Do Life Savers Actually Save Your Life? Separating Fact From Fiction

4 min read

Invented in 1912 by a Cleveland chocolate manufacturer, Life Savers were a clever innovation designed to withstand summer heat, not to prevent asphyxiation. The compelling question remains: Do Life Savers actually save your life?

Quick Summary

The candy's name, 'Life Savers,' is purely a marketing reference to its resemblance to a life preserver. The popular myth that the hole prevents choking is false, and hard candies like Life Savers are a known choking hazard, particularly for young children.

Key Points

  • Name Origin: The name 'Life Savers' comes from the candy's resemblance to a life preserver, not from any life-saving purpose.

  • Choking Myth Debunked: The legend that the hole is for breathing is false; the hole provides no reliable protection against choking.

  • High Choking Risk: Hard candies like Life Savers are a major choking hazard, especially for children under five, and should be avoided.

  • Dental Damage: Prolonged sucking on hard candies exposes teeth to sugar for longer, increasing the risk of cavities and enamel damage.

  • Marketing Prowess: The longevity of the brand is due to smart marketing, including positioning and affordable pricing, not any health benefits.

  • Responsible Consumption: Enjoying hard candy requires awareness of its risks, especially regarding choking and dental health, and is best done in moderation.

In This Article

The True Origin of the Iconic Name

The story behind the name of Life Savers is a fascinating tale of early 20th-century marketing, not medical safety. The iconic candy was created in 1912 by Clarence Crane, a chocolate maker in Cleveland, Ohio. He was looking for a product that wouldn't melt during the summer, a problem that significantly impacted his chocolate sales. Inspired by the round, flat peppermint shape, which looked like miniature life preservers, he named his new creation 'Life Savers'. The distinctive shape helped differentiate his mints from the pillow-shaped European peppermints that dominated the market at the time. The subsequent sale of the company to Edward J. Noble, who improved the packaging, led to the brand becoming a national sensation, but the origin story remains rooted in clever branding, not a tragedy or safety innovation.

Debunking the Choking Myth

There is a persistent urban legend suggesting that the hole in the center of Life Savers was created to allow a person to breathe if the candy became lodged in their throat. The myth often includes a tragic story about Crane's daughter choking on candy. This tale is entirely untrue. The hole was a design choice from the beginning, inspired by its namesake, the life preserver. Medical experts confirm that while the hole exists, it offers no guarantee of preventing a choking fatality. In fact, hard candies, including Life Savers, are considered a significant choking hazard, especially for children under five.

The Real Dangers of Hard Candy

As tempting as the name is, hard candies present several health and safety considerations that consumers should be aware of. They are not a medicine or a safety device but a confectionary item primarily composed of sugar.

Choking Risk: A Real-World Danger

Hard candies are among the top causes of choking incidents in children. The American Academy of Pediatrics strongly advises against giving hard candies to children under the age of five. When sucked on, hard candies become smooth and slippery, making them easy to accidentally inhale and block the airway. If a child inhales a piece of hard candy, the piece can completely seal the windpipe, and the hole in a Life Saver offers no reliable protection. Parents and caregivers should exercise extreme caution and consider safer alternatives, such as softer, chewable options. For infants and toddlers, it is best to avoid all forms of candy.

Oral Health: The Sweet Truth

From an oral health perspective, hard candies are particularly damaging because they stay in the mouth for a long time. The prolonged exposure to sugar feeds the bacteria in the mouth, which in turn produce acids that demineralize and weaken tooth enamel. This process significantly increases the risk of tooth decay and cavities. Additionally, biting down on hard candies can chip or crack teeth, damage dental work, or injure the jaw. For better dental hygiene, it is recommended to brush and floss after eating candy, and to rinse with water to help wash away the sugar.

A Comparison of Candy Risks

Candy Type Choking Risk Oral Health Risk Common Examples Safer Alternatives
Hard Candy High, especially for young children High (prolonged sugar exposure, potential tooth damage) Life Savers, Jolly Ranchers, Peppermints Melt-in-your-mouth chocolates, sugar-free gum
Sticky/Chewy High High (gets stuck to teeth and dental work) Caramel, Taffy, Gummy Bears Fresh fruit, low-sugar popsicles
Small/Round High Moderate (can lodge between teeth) M&Ms, Skittles, Reese's Pieces Pretzels, popcorn (for older kids)
Melt-in-Mouth Low (if chewed properly) Low Chocolate bars, Hershey's Kisses Dark chocolate (lower sugar)

Informed Choices and Safe Consumption

Understanding the facts about hard candy is essential for making informed decisions, particularly for families with young children. While hard candies have been a nostalgic treat for generations, prioritizing safety and health is paramount. When purchasing and consuming candy, consider the following:

  • Read the Labels: Always check product warnings. Some candy packaging, particularly for products intended for children, may include choking hazard labels.
  • Consider Age Appropriateness: Be mindful of the age of the person eating the candy. Hard candies should not be given to children under five.
  • Emphasize Moderation: Like any sugary treat, hard candy should be consumed in moderation. Too much sugar can lead to weight gain, type 2 diabetes, and other health issues.
  • Prioritize Dental Hygiene: Encourage regular brushing, flossing, and drinking water, especially after indulging in sugary treats, to mitigate the risks to dental health.
  • Explore Alternatives: For a sweet tooth, there are many healthier alternatives available, such as fresh fruit, low-sugar yogurt, or dark chocolate.

Conclusion: The Final Word on Life Savers

In the end, Life Savers are a testament to successful marketing and brand longevity, not a tool for emergency rescue. The name is a charming piece of candy history, but the legend of the candy's life-saving properties is a dangerous falsehood. By understanding the true origin of the name and the real risks associated with hard candies, consumers can enjoy these treats responsibly while prioritizing safety and dental health. Always remember that for choking emergencies, the Heimlich maneuver is the only proven method, not a piece of candy.

For more insight into the interesting history behind this popular confection, you can read the article from Mental Floss on the surprising facts about Life Savers: 10 Things You Might Not Know about Life Savers.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, that is a widely circulated urban legend. The inventor, Clarence Crane, named the candy because its ring shape resembled a life preserver. There is no evidence of a family tragedy motivating the design.

No, the hole does not reliably prevent choking. If a hard candy lodges in the throat, the hole can be covered or blocked, and breathing can be obstructed.

Medical experts and pediatric associations advise against giving hard candies, including Life Savers, to young children, especially those under five, due to the significant choking hazard they pose.

Prevention is key. Avoid giving hard candy to young children. For older individuals, encourage conscious sucking rather than biting. In case of an incident, perform the Heimlich maneuver and call emergency services.

The primary health concerns include the high sugar content, which promotes tooth decay, and the choking hazard associated with consuming a hard, round object.

No. Life Savers are a confectionery item with no medicinal properties. While some people might use mint versions for breath freshening, they offer no health benefits.

Yes. Healthier options for satisfying a sweet craving include fresh fruit, low-sugar yogurt, or small amounts of dark chocolate.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.