Skip to content

How to document dyspnea? A comprehensive guide for healthcare providers

4 min read

According to research, standardized dyspnea assessment is not always well-defined in clinical practice, highlighting the need for robust protocols. This comprehensive guide provides healthcare providers with the essential framework for how to document dyspnea accurately and effectively, ensuring clarity and consistency in patient records.

Quick Summary

Healthcare professionals can document dyspnea by capturing both objective and subjective data, including the patient's self-reported experience, observed signs of respiratory distress, severity using standardized scales like the Modified Borg or Numerical Rating Scale, and the impact on their daily functioning.

Key Points

  • Capture Subjective and Objective Data: Document the patient's self-reported sensation of breathlessness (subjective) alongside observable signs and measurements like respiratory rate and oxygen saturation (objective).

  • Use Standardized Scales: Employ tools like the Modified Borg Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, or MRC Scale to consistently quantify dyspnea severity over time.

  • Assess Functional Impact: Record how dyspnea affects the patient's daily activities and mobility, noting any limitations.

  • Include Onset and Timing: Document the timing of the dyspnea, noting if its onset was sudden or gradual and its duration.

  • Structure Your Note Clearly: Use a standard format like SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) to ensure all essential components are included in your clinical note.

  • Be Specific with Patient Descriptions: Use the patient's own words whenever possible to accurately reflect their experience of breathing discomfort.

In This Article

Understanding the Importance of Accurate Dyspnea Documentation

Dyspnea, or shortness of breath, is a subjective symptom that can be a hallmark of many conditions, from heart failure and COPD to anxiety. Its accurate documentation is vital for several reasons, including effective communication between healthcare team members, tracking a patient's response to treatment, and ensuring proper billing and legal compliance. Inadequate or inconsistent documentation can lead to misinterpretations, delayed interventions, and suboptimal patient outcomes.

Capturing the Subjective Patient Experience

Because dyspnea is a subjective symptom, the patient's own description is the cornerstone of effective documentation. This involves capturing their reported sensations and the context in which they occur. It is important to use the patient's own words whenever possible to maintain accuracy and avoid bias.

Patient-reported sensations

Ask the patient to describe their breathing discomfort. Common phrases may include:

  • "I feel like I'm suffocating."
  • "I can't get enough air in."
  • "My chest feels tight."
  • "My breathing feels shallow."
  • "I'm out of breath."

Onset and timing

Note when the dyspnea started, how long it lasts, and its frequency. Questions to consider include:

  • Onset: Was it sudden or gradual?
  • Duration: Is it constant or intermittent?
  • Frequency: How often does it occur?

Evaluating Objective Clinical Indicators

In addition to the patient's report, objective clinical signs provide crucial context for the severity of dyspnea. These are the measurable, observable signs that support the subjective information.

Vital signs and physical assessment

Record the following observations at the time of the assessment:

  • Respiratory rate: Count the breaths per minute. A rate of >20 is often considered tachypnea.
  • Oxygen saturation (SpO2): Measure the peripheral oxygen saturation, noting if the patient is on room air or supplemental oxygen.
  • Physical signs: Document any visible signs of respiratory distress, such as accessory muscle use, pursed-lip breathing, or cyanosis.
  • Auscultation findings: Note any abnormal lung sounds, like wheezing, crackles, or diminished breath sounds.

Standardized Scales for Quantifying Severity

Using a standardized scale helps to quantify a patient's dyspnea and track changes over time. Consistency in using the same scale for a patient is key.

  • Modified Borg Scale (Rating of Perceived Dyspnea): A 0-10 scale where 0 is "no shortness of breath" and 10 is "maximal or worst possible shortness of breath." The patient points to or verbally indicates their number.
  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): A simpler 0-10 scale often used when the Modified Borg Scale is too complex for the patient. 0 represents no dyspnea and 10 represents the worst dyspnea imaginable.
  • Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnea Scale: A 5-grade scale that measures the impact of dyspnea on daily activities, ranging from Grade 1 (strenuous exercise) to Grade 5 (severe dyspnea at rest).

Documenting the Impact on Functional Ability

Dyspnea's effect on a patient's ability to perform activities of daily living is a critical component of documentation. This helps paint a complete picture of the patient's condition.

Activity level and triggers

Describe what activities trigger or worsen the dyspnea. For example, dyspnea with walking, climbing stairs, or simply speaking.

Functional limitations

Detail how the dyspnea is limiting the patient. This could include inability to complete dressing, bathing, or walking a certain distance without stopping.

Comparison of Common Dyspnea Rating Scales

To illustrate the differences between common rating tools, the following table provides a clear comparison:

Feature Modified Borg Scale Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale
Format 0-10, with descriptive anchors 0-10, with verbal anchors 5-grade, based on activity
Focus Perceived intensity of dyspnea Perceived intensity of dyspnea Impact on functional activity
Best for... Patients who can accurately perceive and rate their sensation Quick, easy assessment in many settings Long-term tracking of functional impairment
Ease of Use Moderate, requires a chart/card Very easy and direct Easy, based on patient history and report
Example Documentation "Patient rates dyspnea as a 5/10 on the Borg Scale at rest." "Patient states dyspnea is 7/10 when walking to the bathroom." "Patient is MRC Grade 3, able to walk slowly on level ground but stops for breath after a few minutes."

Structure of a Comprehensive Dyspnea Note

When compiling a clinical note, a structured approach ensures all necessary information is included. A well-organized note facilitates clear communication and continuity of care.

  1. Subjective (S): Begin with the patient's own words and self-reported experience. Include when the dyspnea started, what it feels like, and what makes it better or worse.
  2. Objective (O): Document the measurable data. This includes vital signs (RR, SpO2), physical exam findings, and the score from any standardized scale used.
  3. Assessment (A): Provide a summary statement that combines the subjective and objective findings. Include your interpretation of the severity and potential causes.
  4. Plan (P): Outline the next steps for care. This might include administering oxygen, adjusting medication, further testing, or educating the patient on breathing techniques.

For additional guidance on respiratory assessments, visit the American Association for Respiratory Care at https://www.aarc.org.

Case Study: Documenting Dyspnea in an Emergency Setting

Scenario: A 65-year-old male with a history of COPD presents to the emergency department complaining of increased shortness of breath.

S: Patient reports feeling "very short of breath," stating, "I feel like I'm not getting enough air in." Started about 3 hours ago, worsening progressively. Reports using his rescue inhaler with no relief. O: RR 28, labored. SpO2 88% on room air. Noted tripod position, accessory muscle use observed. Lung sounds reveal diffuse bilateral wheezing. Patient rates dyspnea as 8/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale. A: Acute exacerbation of COPD with severe dyspnea. P: Administer oxygen via nasal cannula to maintain SpO2 >90%. Administer nebulized albuterol and ipratropium. Order chest x-ray and CBC. Monitor patient closely for changes in respiratory status. Educate patient on pursed-lip breathing techniques.

This structured approach, including both patient perception and objective data, provides a complete and actionable record. By incorporating these methods, healthcare professionals can ensure their documentation is thorough, accurate, and supportive of excellent patient care.

Frequently Asked Questions

The most important information includes the patient's subjective description of their breathing discomfort, the measured objective data (vital signs, oxygen saturation), the severity rating using a standardized scale, and the impact the dyspnea has on their ability to function.

Severity can be rated using standardized scales such as the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, the Modified Borg Scale, or the 5-grade Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnea Scale, which focuses on functional impact.

Yes, using the patient's exact words provides the most accurate and unbiased representation of their subjective experience. This should be captured in the 'Subjective' portion of your note.

Objective signs to document include respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), any use of accessory muscles for breathing, pursed-lip breathing, and abnormal lung sounds noted on auscultation.

Accurate documentation helps healthcare providers track changes in a patient's condition, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and ensures consistent care from the entire medical team. It also serves as a crucial legal record.

Subjective documentation records the patient's personal, internal experience of dyspnea, such as their feelings of air hunger. Objective documentation records observable, measurable data collected by the healthcare provider, like respiratory rate or SpO2.

Yes, documenting the effect on daily activities, such as walking or bathing, is vital. It provides a clear picture of the dyspnea's functional impact and can be a more practical measure of severity for long-term tracking than a snapshot intensity score.

References

  1. 1

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.