What led to the change in terminology?
For decades, the phrase "medically unexplained symptoms" (MUS) was widely used, but criticized because it often implied symptoms were "all in the head" and invalidated patients' distress. It also lacked a clear treatment path. New terminology aims to be more patient-centered and focuses on identifying a condition rather than excluding others.
The official new terms: Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders
The DSM-5 introduced "Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders" (SSRDs), replacing older terms like "Somatoform Disorders".
Key disorders within this category:
- Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD): Characterized by distressing physical symptoms and excessive thoughts, feelings, or behaviors related to these symptoms.
- Illness Anxiety Disorder: Involves preoccupation with having or developing a serious illness, with minimal or no physical symptoms.
- Functional Neurological Symptom Disorder (Conversion Disorder): Features nervous system symptoms not consistent with neurological disease but causing distress.
Other modern terminology for related syndromes
Alternative terms are used to provide less pathologizing labels:
Prominent alternative terms:
- Persistent Physical Symptoms (PPS): Highlights the long-lasting nature and physical reality of symptoms.
- Functional Somatic Disorders (FSD): An umbrella term for conditions with persistent physical symptoms stemming from disturbed bodily function.
- Psychophysiologic Disorders (PPD): Emphasizes physical symptoms influenced by psychological factors.
How are the new terms different?
The new terminology adopts a biopsychosocial approach, recognizing the interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors in causing real symptoms, moving away from a rigid mind-body split.
Old vs. New Terminology: A Comparison
Aspect | Older Terminology (MUS) | Newer Terminology (SSRD, PPS, FSD) |
---|---|---|
Focus | Exclusionary diagnosis: Focuses on the absence of a medical explanation. | Inclusionary diagnosis: Focuses on the presence of real, distressing symptoms and the patient's response. |
Patient Experience | Often invalidating; can imply symptoms are "all in your head." | Validating; confirms symptoms are real and distressing, regardless of origin. |
Mind-Body Duality | Reinforces the separation of mind and body. | Embraces the mind-body connection; understands psychological stress can manifest physically. |
Treatment Approach | Can lead to a cycle of unnecessary medical tests. | Focuses on managing symptoms, restoring function, and addressing related psychological factors. |
Acceptability | Frustrating and stigmatizing for many patients. | More neutral and patient-centered, promoting better therapeutic alliances. |
Implications for patients and physicians
The shift encourages physicians towards a holistic approach and validates patients' experiences. Effective management often involves a multidisciplinary team and therapies like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
The path forward
Moving away from MUS signifies progress in understanding and care. A biopsychosocial approach and new terminology help reduce stigma and improve treatment.
For more comprehensive information, an authoritative resource is available from the American Psychiatric Association.